Initial Experience With Intercostal Insertion of an Extravascular ICD Lead Compatible With Existing Pulse Generators.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed safety and feasibility of a novel extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) lead when inserted anteriorly through a rib space and connected to various commercially available ICD pulse generators (PGs) placed in either a left mid-axillary or left pectoral pocket. Currently available or investigational, extravascular-ICDs include a subcutaneous or subxiphoid lead connected to customized extravascular-ICD PGs. METHODS: This novel extravascular-ICD (AtaCor Medical Inc, San Clemente, CA) employs a unique intercostal implant technique and is designed to function with commercial DF-4 ICD PGs. In this nonrandomized, single-center, acute study, 36 de novo or replacement ICD (transvenous ICD) patients enrolled to receive a concomitant extravascular-ICD lead inserted through an intercostal space along the left parasternal margin. extravascular-ICD leads were connected to DF-4 compatible ICD PGs positioned in either a left mid-axillary or pectoral pocket for acute sensing and defibrillation testing. Defibrillation testing started at 30 Joules (J) and stepped up or down in 5 to 10 joule increments depending on the success and limitations of the generator used. RESULTS: Successful acute defibrillation using ≤35 J was noted in 100% of left mid-axillary PG subjects (n=27, mean 16.3±8.6 J) and 83% of left pectoral PG subjects (n=6, mean 21.0±8.4 J). Furthermore, 24 of 27 (89%) of patients tested with a left, mid-axillary intermuscular PG had successful VF conversion with defibrillation energies at least 10 J below the maximum delivered output of the device. All evaluable episodes (n=93) were automatically sensed, detected, and shocked. No serious device-related intraoperative adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This first-in-human study documented the safe and reliable placement of a novel extravascular ICD lead with effective sensing and defibrillation of induced ventricular fibrillation using commercial DF-4 ICD PGs.

Factors Associated With High-Voltage Impedance and Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator Ventricular Fibrillation Conversion Success.

BACKGROUND: The ability to predict defibrillation efficacy at the time of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation without the need to induce ventricular fibrillation might eliminate the need for defibrillation testing. The purpose of this study was to determine the association of high-voltage impedance and system implant position on ventricular fibrillation conversion success with a submaximal 65-J shock. METHODS: In the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator IDE study (Investigational Device Exemption), a successful conversion test required 2 consecutive ventricular fibrillation conversions at 65 J in either shock vector. Chest radiographs were obtained after implantation. Patients with imaging and impedance data were included. Suboptimal device position was defined as an inferior electrode or pulse generator or electrode coil depth >3 mm anterior to the sternum. Absence of suboptimal positional parameters was defined as appropriate position. Conversion success rate was calculated among all 65-J tests. RESULTS: Of 314 patients who underwent subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, 282 patients were included in this analysis. There were 637 inductions to test defibrillation at 65 J. Sixty-two conversion failures (9.7%) occurred in 42 (14.9%) patients. Lower body mass index and lower shock impedance were associated with higher conversion success rate, whereas white race was associated with lower conversion success rate. Suboptimal position was more common in obese patients. Inferior electrode and greater distance between the lead and sternum were associated with a higher impedance. When appropriate system position was achieved, conversion failure was not associated with high body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock efficacy is associated with system position and high-voltage system impedance. A high impedance is associated with inferiorly placed pulse generator and electrode system, inadequate coil depth, and a lower rate of defibrillator success. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01064076.

Implant and Midterm Outcomes of the Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry: The EFFORTLESS Study.

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) was developed to defibrillate ventricular arrhythmias, avoiding drawbacks of transvenous leads. The global EFFORTLESS S-ICD (Evaluation oF FactORs ImpacTing CLinical Outcome and Cost EffectiveneSS of the S-ICD) registry is collecting outcomes in 985 patients during a 5-year follow-up. OBJECTIVES: The primary goal of the EFFORTLESS registry is to determine the safety of the S-ICD by evaluating complications and inappropriate shock rate. METHODS: This is the first report on the full patient cohort and study endpoints with follow-up ≥1 year. The predefined endpoints are 30- and 360-day complications, and shocks for atrial fibrillation or supraventricular tachycardia. RESULTS: Patients were followed for 3.1 ± 1.5 years and 82 completed the study protocol 5-year visit. Average age was 48 years, 28% were women, ejection fraction was 43 ± 18%, and 65% had a primary prevention indication. The S-ICD system and procedure complication rate was 4.1% at 30 days and 8.4% at 360 days. The 1-year complication rate trended toward improvement from the first to last quartile of enrollment (11.3% [quartile 1]) to 7.8% [quartile 2], 6.6% [quartile 3], and 7.4% [quartile 4]; quartile 1 vs. quartiles 2 to 4; p = 0.06). Few device extractions occurred due to need for antitachycardia (n = 5), or biventricular (n = 4) or bradycardia pacing (n = 1). Inappropriate shocks occurred in 8.1% at 1 year and 11.7% after 3.1 years. At implant, 99.5% of patients had a successful conversion of induced ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. The 1- and 5-year rates of appropriate shock were 5.8% and 13.5%, respectively. Conversion success for discrete spontaneous episodes was 97.4% overall. CONCLUSIONS: This registry demonstrates that the S-ICD fulfills predefined endpoints for safety and efficacy. Midterm performance rates on complications, inappropriate shocks, and conversion efficacy were comparable to rates observed in transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator studies. (Evaluation oF Factors ImpacTing CLinical Outcome and Cost EffectiveneSS of the S-ICD [The EFFORTLESS S-ICD Registry]; NCT01085435).

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Post-Approval Study: Clinical characteristics and perioperative results.

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) was developed to reduce short- and long-term complications associated with transvenous ICD leads. Early multicenter studies included younger patients with less left ventricular systolic dysfunction and fewer comorbidities than cohorts with traditional ICD. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize patient selection and the acute performance of the S-ICD in a contemporary real-world setting. METHODS: The S-ICD Post-Approval Study is a prospective registry involving 86 US centers. Patients were enrolled if they met criteria for S-ICD implantation, passed an electrocardiogram screening test, and had a life expectancy of >1 year. Analyses of descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier time to event, and multivariate logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: The study includes 1637 patients who underwent S-ICD implantation. The cohort included 68.6% (1123/1637) male patients, and 13.4% (220/1636) were receiving dialysis for end-stage renal disease. The mean age was 52 ± 15 years, with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 32.0% ± 14.6%. Electrocardiogram screening was successful for at least 1, 2, or 3 vectors in 100%, 93.8%, and 51.4% of patients, respectively. Medical imaging (65.1%, 1065/1636) and general anesthesia (64.1%, 1048/16) were used in a majority of patients, and 52.2% (855/1637) were implanted with the 2-incision technique. Induced ventricular tachycardia/ventricular tachycardia was successfully converted in 98.7% (1394/1412) of patients. The 30-day complication-free rate was 96.2%. Predictors of complications included diabetes, younger age, and higher body mass index. CONCLUSION: Contemporary US patients with S-ICD have more comorbidities than do previous cohorts with S-ICD, but they are younger with more end-stage renal disease than do patients with transvenous ICD. Implantation success is high, and short-term complication rates are acceptable.

The Design of the Understanding Outcomes with the S-ICD in Primary Prevention Patients with Low EF Study (UNTOUCHED).

BACKGROUND: The UNTOUCHED study will assess the safety and efficacy of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) in the most common cohort of patients receiving ICDs. The primary goal is to evaluate the inappropriate shock (IAS)-free rate in primary prevention patients with a reduced ejection fraction (EF) and compare with a historical control of transvenous ICD patients with similar programming. METHODS AND RESULTS: The UNTOUCHED study is a global, multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized study of patients undergoing de novo S-ICD implantation for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death with a left ventricular EF ≤35%. The primary end point of this trial is freedom from IAS at 18 months. The lower 95% confidence bound of the observed incidence will be compared to a performance goal of 91.6%, which was derived from the IAS rate in MADIT-RIT. The secondary end points are all-cause shock-free rate at 18 months, and system- and procedure-related complication-free rate at 1 month and 6 months. Enrollment of a minimum of 1,100 subjects from up to 200 centers worldwide is planned based on power calculations of the primary and principal secondary end points. CONCLUSIONS: This trial will provide important data regarding the rates of inappropriate and appropriate shock therapy in real-world use of the S-ICD in the most common group of patients receiving ICDs.

Performance of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with a primary prevention indication with and without a reduced ejection fraction versus patients with a secondary prevention indication.

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable defibrillator (S-ICD) provides an alternative to the transvenous ICD for the prevention of sudden cardiac death, but has not been well studied in the most commonly treated transvenous ICD patient population, namely, primary prevention (PP) patients with left ventricular dysfunction. OBJECTIVE: The analyses in the present study were designed to compare clinical outcomes for PP patients with and without a reduced ejection fraction (EF) and secondary prevention (SP) patients implanted with the S-ICD. METHODS: All patients 18 years and older from the S-ICD IDE study and the EFFORTLESS Registry with available data as of November 18, 2013, were included (n = 856; mean follow-up duration 644 days). Outcomes were evaluated in 2 analyses: (1) comparing all PP patients (n = 603, 70.4%) with all SP patients (n = 253, 29.6%) and (2) comparing all PP patients with an EF ≤35% (n = 379) with those with an EF >35% (n = 149, 17.4%). RESULTS: No differences were observed in mortality, complications, inappropriate therapy, or ability to convert ventricular tachyarrhythmias between SP and PP patients. However, SP patients had a higher incidence of appropriate therapy than did PP patients (11.9% vs 5.0%; P = .0004). In the PP subanalysis, the cohort with an EF ≤35% had significantly older patients with more comorbidities and higher mortality (3.0% annually vs 0.0%). Despite these differences, device-related complications, conversion efficacy, and incidence of inappropriate shock therapies were not significantly different between PP subgroups. CONCLUSION: The S-ICD performs well in protecting patients with either PP or SP implant indications from sudden cardiac death. Within PP patients, device performance was independent of EF.

The Association between the PR Interval and Left Ventricular Measurements in the Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Introduction. Few studies have examined the association between the PR interval (PRi) and subclinical cardiovascular disease measures. Methods and Results. The Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) is a population-based study of 6814 men and women aged 45-84 years without clinical cardiovascular disease and 4962 had complete baseline data on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging measures of LV dimension and ejection fraction and surface electrocardiogram. Linear regression models were constructed to determine the adjusted association between the PRi and measures of LV stroke volume, LV mass, LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes, and ejection fraction. Overall, mean age was 61.5 years, and 47.6% were male and race/ethnicity was white in 39.1%, Chinese in 13.1%, African-American in 25.7%, and Hispanic in 22.2%. The PRi ranged from 88 to 308 ms with a median value of 162 ms. As a continuous variable, every standard deviation unit (25 ms) increment in PRi was associated with a 2.00 mL (95% CI 1.52, 2.48) higher stroke volume, a 3.08 g (95% CI 2.30, 3.86) higher LV mass, a 1.36 g/m(2) (95% CI 0.96, 1.76) higher LV mass index, and 1.31 mL (95% CI 0.88, 1.73) higher end-systolic and 3.31 mL (95% CI 2.58, 4.03) higher end-diastolic volumes after adjustment for all covariates. No significant association was noted between the PRi and LV ejection fraction. Conclusions. A prolonged PRi is associated with LV measures and may in part explain the link between a prolonged PRi and cardiovascular outcomes.

Inappropriate shocks in the subcutaneous ICD: Incidence, predictors and management.

BACKGROUND: The entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) eliminates the need for transvenous leads, and therefore has the potential to improve lead-longevity and reduce lead-related complications. The S-ICD has a morphology-based sensing algorithm of which inappropriate shocks have been reported. METHODS: We analyzed the incidence, predictors and management of inappropriate shocks in the EFFORTLESS S-ICD Registry, which collects S-ICD implantation information and follow-up data from clinical centers in Europe and New Zealand. RESULTS: During a follow-up of 21 ± 13 months, 48 out of 581 S-ICD patients (71% male, age 49 ± 18 years) experienced 101 inappropriate shocks (8.3%). The most common cause was cardiac signal oversensing (73%), such as T-wave oversensing. Eighteen shocks (18%) were due to supraventricular tachycardias (SVT), of which 15 occurred in the shock-only zone. Cox-proportional hazard modeling using time-dependent covariates demonstrated that patients with a history of atrial fibrillation (HR 2.4) and patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HR 4.6) had an increased risk for inappropriate shocks, while programming the primary vector for sensing (from xyphoid to V6) reduced the risk. Reprogramming or optimization of SVT treatment after the first clinical event of inappropriate shock was successful in preventing further inappropriate shocks for cardiac oversensing and SVT events. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate shocks, mainly due to cardiac oversensing, occurred in 8.3% of the S-ICD patients. Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or a history of atrial fibrillation were at increased risk, warranting specific attention for sensing and programming in this population.

Safety and Efficacy of the Totally Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator: 2-Year Results From a Pooled Analysis of the IDE Study and EFFORTLESS Registry.

BACKGROUND: The entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is the first implantable defibrillator that avoids placing electrodes in or around the heart. Two large prospective studies (IDE [S-ICD System IDE Clinical Investigation] and EFFORTLESS [Boston Scientific Post Market S-ICD Registry]) have reported 6-month to 1-year data on the S-ICD. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the S-ICD in a large diverse population. METHODS: Data from the IDE and EFFORTLESS studies were pooled. Shocks were independently adjudicated, and complications were measured with a standardized classification scheme. Enrollment date quartiles were used to assess event rates over time. RESULTS: Eight hundred eighty-two patients who underwent implantation were followed for 651±345 days. Spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) events (n=111) were treated in 59 patients; 100 (90.1%) events were terminated with 1 shock, and 109 events (98.2%) were terminated within the 5 available shocks. The estimated 3-year inappropriate shock rate was 13.1%. Estimated 3-year, all-cause mortality was 4.7% (95% confidence interval: 0.9% to 8.5%), with 26 deaths (2.9%). Device-related complications occurred in 11.1% of patients at 3 years. There were no electrode failures, and no S-ICD-related endocarditis or bacteremia occurred. Three devices (0.3%) were replaced for right ventricular pacing. The 6-month complication rate decreased by quartile of enrollment (Q1: 8.9%; Q4: 5.5%), and there was a trend toward a reduction in inappropriate shocks (Q1: 6.9% Q4: 4.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The S-ICD demonstrated high efficacy for VT/VF. Complications and inappropriate shock rates were reduced consistently with strategic programming and as operator experience increased. These data provide further evidence for the safety and efficacy of the S-ICD. (Boston Scientific Post Market S-ICD Registry [EFFORTLESS]; NCT01085435; S-ICD® System IDE Clinical Study; NCT01064076).

Development of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for reducing sudden cardiac death.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) detect ventricular arrhythmias responsible for causing sudden cardiac arrest and then deliver a high-voltage defibrillation shock to terminate the arrhythmia and restore normal cardiac function. Conventional transveneous ICD (TV-ICD) systems require one or more leads to be implanted into the heart through the venous anatomy. While TV-ICDs are well tolerated by most patients, the invasive approach can be associated with severe complications, including systemic infection, cardiac injuries, and lead failures. An entirely subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) system was developed as a less invasive alternative to TV-ICDs without requiring leads in or on the heart. The S-ICD system provides therapy with a left lateral pulse generator and parasternal electrode configuration that is placed under the skin outside the rib cage, resulting in a much lower risk profile. Advances in defibrillation research and far-field sensing combined to enable development of the commercial S-ICD system. An investigation device exemption (IDE) clinical investigation followed, with FDA approval in September 2012. Evaluation of the long-term performance of the S-ICD system continues, with two independent postmarket registries and a prospective randomized head-to-head trial versus the transvenous ICD.

Use of a discrimination algorithm to reduce inappropriate shocks with a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator system (S-ICD) uses a novel detection algorithm previously shown to discriminate induced tachyarrhythmias (ventricular vs supraventricular) effectively. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of the S-ICD discrimination algorithm in reducing the incidence of spontaneous inappropriate shocks. METHODS: A total of 314 subjects underwent implantation with an S-ICD system as part of the S-ICD Clinical Investigation (IDE Trial). Subjects were grouped according to programming at discharge to either a single shock zone or 2 shock zones, with a discrimination algorithm in the lower rate zone. RESULTS: This cohort had 226 subjects (72%) with dual zone programming and 88 subjects (28%) with single zone programming. Over a mean follow-up period of 661 ± 174 days, inappropriate shocks occurred in 23 subjects from the dual zone subgroup (10.2%) and 23 subjects from the single zone subgroup (26.1%, P < .001), with 2-year inappropriate shock-free rates of 89.7% vs. 73.6%;,respectively (hazard ratio 0.38, P = .001). Freedom from appropriate shocks did not differ between subgroups (92.2% vs. 90.3%, hazard ratio 0.82, P = .64). Moreover, mean time to appropriate therapy did not differ between subgroups, and there was only 1 episode of arrhythmic syncope in the cohort. CONCLUSION: The addition of a second shock zone with an active discrimination algorithm was strongly associated with a reduction in inappropriate shocks with the S-ICD system and did not result in prolongation of detection times or increased syncope. These data support the use of dual zone programming as a standard setting for S-ICD patients.